How Environmental Toxins Affect Children

Story At-A-Glance

Children’s developing brains are uniquely vulnerable to environmental toxins due to rapid neural growth, synaptic pruning, ongoing myelination, and physiological factors like higher absorption rates and immature detoxification systems.
Common neurotoxins include heavy metals (lead, mercury, arsenic), endocrine-disrupting chemicals (BPA, phthalates, flame retardants), pesticides (organophosphates, pyrethroids, glyphosate), and air pollutants (particulate matter, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons).
These toxins can significantly impact cognitive functions essential for learning, including executive function, attention, language processing, and social-emotional regulation.
The effects of environmental toxins can be amplified by genetic susceptibility, nutritional status, and the timing of exposure during critical developmental windows.
Potential signs of toxin effects include unexplained declines in academic performance, inconsistent cognitive abilities, fluctuating attention and emotional regulation, and physical symptoms like fatigue or headaches.
Practical steps for families to reduce exposure include testing and filtering water, managing household dust, choosing safer household products, and prioritizing organic foods when possible..
Nutritional approaches that may help protect against toxic effects include antioxidant-rich foods, omega-3 fatty acids, and ensuring adequate levels of protective micronutrients like iron, calcium, and zinc.
Case studies demonstrate how identifying and addressing environmental factors can significantly improve cognitive function and learning outcomes in children with unexplained challenges.
Beyond individual actions, broader policy changes are needed, including stronger chemical safety regulations, environmental justice initiatives, and comprehensive school environmental health standards.
The growing science of environmental impacts offers new insights for parents navigating learning disabilities or developmental concerns, opening additional avenues for understanding and intervention.
Creating healthier environments supports not just individual children but entire communities of developing minds, protecting their potential to learn, grow, and flourish

When we think about factors that influence children’s learning and development, we typically focus on educational approaches, learning environments, and support services. However, a growing body of scientific evidence points to another critical factor that often remains invisible: environmental toxins. These substances silently influence neural development and cognitive function, potentially contributing to learning difficulties and neurodevelopmental disorders. For parents of children with learning challenges, understanding this environmental dimension offers new insights and potential pathways for supporting their child’s neurological health and learning capacity.

The Vulnerable Developing Brain: Why Children Are at Greater Risk

Children’s brains are particularly susceptible to environmental toxins for several crucial biological reasons:

Developmental Vulnerability

The human brain develops through a precisely timed and sequenced set of events that begins in utero and continues through adolescence:

Rapid Neural Growth: During early development, neurons form at the astonishing rate of 250,000 per minute during peak periods. This rapid growth creates critical windows of vulnerability when exposure to toxins can disrupt normal developmental trajectories.

Synaptic Pruning: Throughout childhood and adolescence, the brain refines neural connections through pruning—eliminating less-used synapses while strengthening frequently used pathways. Toxins can interfere with this delicate process, affecting the architecture of developing neural networks.

Myelination: The process of forming protective myelin sheaths around nerve fibers continues into early adulthood. Many neurotoxins directly impact glial cells responsible for myelination, potentially reducing neural transmission efficiency.

Dr. Philip Landrigan, pediatrician and epidemiologist at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, explains: “The developing brain has critical periods during which exposure to toxins can permanently alter its structure and function. What might cause minimal harm to an adult brain can fundamentally change the developmental trajectory of a child’s brain.”

Physiological Factors

Children’s bodies process environmental toxins differently than adults:

Higher Absorption Rates: Pound for pound, children breathe more air, drink more water, and consume more food than adults, increasing their exposure to toxins in these sources.

Immature Detoxification Systems: Children’s developing liver and kidneys—the primary organs for filtering toxins—function less efficiently until maturity, allowing toxins to circulate longer in their systems.

Blood-Brain Barrier Development: The blood-brain barrier, which helps protect the brain from harmful substances, is not fully developed in young children, allowing greater passage of toxins into the brain tissue.

Longer Exposure Window: With more years of life ahead, childhood exposures have more time to manifest as health or learning problems, including those that may not appear until later in development.

Research published in The Lancet Neurology identified more than 200 industrial chemicals known to cause neurodevelopmental harm, most of which remain inadequately regulated and present in children’s everyday environments.

Common Environmental Toxins and Their Neurological Effects

Several categories of environmental toxins have been particularly well-studied for their impacts on children’s brain development and function:

Heavy Metals: Silent Intruders in Neural Development

Lead:

Sources: Old paint, contaminated soil, some toys, certain water systems
Neurological Effects: Reduces IQ (even at very low levels), impairs executive function, causes attention deficits, and reduces impulse control
Research Evidence: Studies show that for every 10 μg/dL increase in blood lead level, there is a 4-7 point decrease in IQ. Even levels below 5 μg/dL, once considered “safe,” are now known to impair cognitive function.

Dr. Bruce Lanphear, a leading researcher on environmental neurotoxins, notes: “There is no safe level of lead exposure for children. Even blood lead concentrations below 5 μg/dL are associated with decreased academic achievement, diminished IQ scores, and increased incidence of attention-related behaviors.”

Mercury:

Sources: Certain fish, coal-burning emissions, some older dental fillings
Neurological Effects: Impairs neuronal development, damages cerebellum function, affects language development, and reduces visual-spatial skills
Research Evidence: A study in Neurotoxicology and Teratology found that prenatal mercury exposure was associated with deficits in language skills, attention, and memory that persisted into school age.

Arsenic:

Sources: Contaminated drinking water, pressure-treated wood, some food products
Neurological Effects: Reduces verbal IQ, impairs memory, affects attention and executive function
Research Evidence: Research published in Environmental Health found that children exposed to arsenic in drinking water scored significantly lower on tests of working memory and processing speed.

Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Hormone Havoc

These chemicals interfere with hormone systems that play crucial roles in brain development:

Bisphenol A (BPA):

Sources: Plastic containers, food can linings, receipt paper
Neurological Effects: Disrupts normal brain cell development and organization, affects synapse formation, alters neurotransmitter function
Research Evidence: A longitudinal study published in Pediatrics linked prenatal BPA exposure to increased hyperactivity, anxiety, and depression in children, particularly girls.

Phthalates:

Sources: Vinyl flooring, personal care products, plastic toys, food packaging
Neurological Effects: Disrupts thyroid hormone function crucial for brain development, associated with reduced IQ, attention problems, and behavioral issues
Research Evidence: The Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health found that higher prenatal exposure to phthalates was associated with lower IQ at age 7, with an average decrease of 6-7 points among the most highly exposed children.

Flame Retardants (PBDEs):

Sources: Furniture, electronics, carpeting, some children’s pajamas
Neurological Effects: Disrupts thyroid hormones, affects neural growth and differentiation
Research Evidence: A UC Berkeley study found that every 10-fold increase in PBDE concentration in pregnant women was associated with a 4.5-point decrease in their children’s IQ scores.

Pesticides: Neurodevelopmental Disruptors

Many pesticides were designed specifically to attack the nervous systems of pests but can also impact human neurodevelopment:

Organophosphates:

Sources: Conventional produce, pest control applications
Neurological Effects: Inhibits acetylcholinesterase (an enzyme crucial for proper nerve function), associated with reduced IQ, attention difficulties, and behavioral problems
Research Evidence: The CHAMACOS study, a longitudinal birth cohort study in California, found that prenatal organophosphate exposure was associated with a 7-point IQ deficit in 7-year-olds and increased risk of attention disorders.

Pyrethroids:

Sources: Many household insecticides, lice treatments, garden products
Neurological Effects: Disrupts neural signaling, potentially affecting learning, memory, and behavior
Research Evidence: Research published in Environmental Health Perspectives found associations between pyrethroid exposure and increased risk of behavioral problems in children, particularly ADHD-like symptoms.

Glyphosate:

Sources: Herbicide used on many conventional food crops
Neurological Effects: Emerging research suggests potential disruption of the gut-brain axis and possible effects on neurotransmitter systems
Research Evidence: While human studies are still developing, animal studies indicate potential impacts on neural development and behavior, raising concerns about similar effects in humans.

Air Pollutants: Invisible Neural Threats

Air quality affects brain development in ways scientists are only beginning to understand:

Particulate Matter (PM2.5):

Sources: Vehicle emissions, industrial processes, woodsmoke
Neurological Effects: Triggers neuroinflammation, affects brain structure, associated with cognitive delays and attention problems
Research Evidence: A study published in JAMA Psychiatry found that children exposed to higher levels of air pollution had alterations in brain regions supporting attention and impulse control, with corresponding behavioral symptoms.

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs):

Sources: Vehicle exhaust, cigarette smoke, grilled/smoked foods
Neurological Effects: DNA damage in neural cells, reduced white matter development
Research Evidence: The Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health found that children with high prenatal exposure to PAHs scored 4-5 points lower on IQ tests at age 5 compared to less exposed children.

How Toxins Impact Specific Learning Functions

Environmental toxins can affect several cognitive domains crucial for academic success:

Executive Function

Executive functions—the cognitive processes that enable planning, focus, remembering instructions, and juggling multiple tasks—are particularly vulnerable to environmental toxins:

Working Memory: Multiple toxins, including lead, mercury, and air pollutants, have been shown to reduce working memory capacity—the ability to hold and manipulate information in mind while learning.

Cognitive Flexibility: Exposure to toxins like PCBs and flame retardants is associated with reduced cognitive flexibility—the ability to adapt to new rules or shift approaches when needed.

Inhibitory Control: Lead, organophosphate pesticides, and air pollution exposure correlate with diminished ability to resist impulses and distractions—a capacity crucial for classroom learning.

Research published in Environmental Health Perspectives found that children with higher levels of flame retardants in their bodies showed a 12% decrease in executive function performance compared to those with lower levels.

Attention Systems

Many environmental toxins directly impact the neural pathways that support attention:

Sustained Attention: Multiple studies show that lead, mercury, and organophosphate pesticides reduce children’s ability to maintain focus over time.

Selective Attention: Air pollution and BPA exposure have been linked to difficulty filtering out distractions and focusing on relevant information.

Attention Shifting: PCBs and flame retardants may affect the brain’s ability to appropriately shift attention between tasks—a crucial skill for following classroom instruction.

A meta-analysis of 33 studies published in JAMA Pediatrics found that prenatal and early childhood exposure to multiple common environmental toxins was associated with a 60% increased risk of ADHD symptoms.

Language Processing

Language development and processing can be affected by various toxins:

Phonological Processing: Lead and mercury exposure have been associated with difficulties in processing the sound structures of language—a fundamental skill for reading development.

Vocabulary Development: Studies show children with higher exposures to certain toxins, including PAHs and pesticides, typically develop smaller vocabularies.

Verbal Memory: Several toxins, including heavy metals and flame retardants, have been linked to reduced verbal memory—affecting both language learning and reading comprehension.

Research from the Cincinnati Lead Study found that childhood lead exposure was associated with significant deficits in language processing that persisted into adulthood, with MRI scans showing reduced volume in language-related brain regions.

Social-Emotional Regulation

Environmental toxins can also affect brain regions involved in emotional regulation and social function:

Emotional Control: Lead, mercury, and air pollution exposure have been linked to difficulties regulating emotions and increased emotional reactivity.

Social Perception: Some toxins may affect the brain’s ability to accurately perceive and interpret social cues—a crucial skill for classroom learning and peer relationships.

Stress Response Regulation: Endocrine-disrupting chemicals can affect the development of neural systems that regulate stress responses, potentially increasing anxiety and reducing stress resilience.

A study published in Environmental Health found that children with higher levels of phthalate metabolites showed increased emotional reactivity and behavior problems, even after controlling for other factors.

The Synergistic Effect: When Toxins Combine with Other Factors

Environmental toxins rarely act in isolation. Their effects can be amplified or modified by:

Genetic Susceptibility

Individual genetic variations can dramatically influence how environmental toxins affect brain development:

Detoxification Genes: Variations in genes that control detoxification pathways (like MTHFR, GST, and PON1) can make some children more vulnerable to specific toxins.

Neurological Development Genes: Genetic differences in neural growth factors can increase susceptibility to developmental disruption from toxins.

Gene-Environment Interactions: Some genetic variations only affect development in the presence of certain environmental toxins—a phenomenon known as gene-environment interaction.

Research from the Cincinnati Lead Study found that children with certain genetic variants showed more significant cognitive impacts from the same level of lead exposure compared to those without these variants.

Nutritional Status

Nutrition plays a crucial role in modifying toxin effects:

Protective Nutrients: Adequate levels of certain nutrients—including iron, calcium, zinc, and antioxidants—can reduce absorption of toxins or mitigate their neural effects.

Increased Vulnerability: Nutritional deficiencies, particularly iron deficiency, can amplify the negative effects of toxins like lead on brain development.

Metabolic Interactions: Some nutrients directly affect how the body processes and eliminates toxins, altering their impact on neural systems.

A study published in Environmental Health Perspectives demonstrated that children with higher vitamin C intake showed less cognitive impact from lead exposure compared to those with lower intake.

Timing of Exposure

When exposure occurs during development can dramatically influence outcomes:

Critical Windows: Specific developmental processes have precise timing, creating periods of heightened vulnerability to particular toxins.

Cumulative Effects: Prolonged or repeated exposures can have more significant impacts than brief exposures, even at lower levels.

Developmental Trajectories: Early exposures can alter developmental trajectories in ways that may not become apparent until later challenges emerge, such as the transition to more demanding academic work.

Research from the CHARGE study found that timing of pesticide exposure significantly influenced which developmental domains were most affected, with different patterns of cognitive and behavioral effects depending on when exposure occurred.

Recognizing Signs of Potential Toxin Effects

While the effects of environmental toxins can overlap with many developmental and learning differences, certain patterns may suggest toxic exposure deserves consideration:

Academic Red Flags

Unexplained declines in academic performance
Inconsistent cognitive abilities across domains
Difficulty with specific cognitive functions like working memory or processing speed
Learning difficulties that don’t respond typically to standard interventions
Unusual learning profiles that don’t fit common patterns of specific learning disabilities

Behavioral Indicators

Increase in impulsivity or attention difficulties
Emotional dysregulation that seems to fluctuate or worsen in certain environments
Fine or gross motor coordination difficulties
Memory inconsistencies
Sensory sensitivities that fluctuate in intensity

Physical Manifestations

Unexplained fatigue or frequent headaches
Sleep disturbances that affect learning
Multiple chemical sensitivities
Unusual reactions to medications or supplements
Gastrointestinal issues that may affect the gut-brain axis

Dr. Martha Herbert, pediatric neurologist and neuroscientist at Harvard Medical School, advises: “When children show unexplained learning or behavioral difficulties, especially when they don’t fully match typical patterns or don’t respond to standard interventions, consider whether environmental factors might be playing a role.”

Reducing Exposure: Practical Steps for Families

While complete avoidance of environmental toxins is impossible in today’s world, parents can take pragmatic steps to reduce exposure:

In the Home

Water Quality:

Test home drinking water for lead, arsenic, and other contaminants
Install appropriate filtration based on test results
Run cold water for cooking and drinking
Use filtered water for formula preparation and cooking

Dust Management:

Use damp cleaning methods to reduce dust circulation
Remove shoes at the door to prevent tracking in outdoor pollutants
Use high-quality vacuum with HEPA filter
Wash hands frequently, especially before eating

Household Products:

Choose fragrance-free cleaning products
Avoid air fresheners and scented products
Select no/low-VOC paints and finishes
Ensure proper ventilation during home repairs/renovations

Food Practices:

Prioritize organic produce, especially for items on the “Dirty Dozen” list
Avoid canned foods or seek BPA-free cans
Minimize processed foods with artificial colors and preservatives
Use glass, stainless steel, or ceramic containers instead of plastic

Research published in Environmental Health Perspectives found that families who made these types of changes showed a 50-70% reduction in levels of certain toxins in their bodies within just a few weeks.

In Community

Community Advocacy:

Support policies that reduce toxin exposure in schools and public spaces
Participate in community environmental monitoring projects
Advocate for green spaces and urban planning that reduces pollution exposure
Join with other parents to push for non-toxic school environments

Transportation Choices:

Reduce idling time when driving
Consider walking or biking routes that avoid heavy traffic
Support public transportation and carpooling initiatives
Advocate for anti-idling policies near schools and playgrounds

A study from the Center for Health, Environment & Justice found that parent advocacy was the single most effective factor in reducing toxin use in school environments, with organized parent groups achieving policy changes in over 70% of documented cases.

Supporting Brain Health: Counteracting Toxic Effects

When exposure has occurred or cannot be fully prevented, these approaches may help protect brain development:

Nutritional Support

Evidence suggests certain nutritional approaches may help mitigate some effects of toxin exposure:

Antioxidant-Rich Foods:

Colorful fruits and vegetables provide antioxidants that combat oxidative stress caused by many toxins
Berries, in particular, have shown neuroprotective effects in multiple studies
Cruciferous vegetables support detoxification pathways

Omega-3 Fatty Acids:

Critical for neural membrane health and neurodevelopment
May help protect against some toxic effects on brain development
Sources include low-mercury fish, flaxseeds, and walnuts

Micronutrients of Special Concern:

Iron, calcium, and zinc status affect absorption of toxic metals
B vitamins support detoxification pathways
Vitamin D appears protective against some neurotoxic effects

A study published in Environmental Health found that children with higher fruit and vegetable intake showed 30% less cognitive impact from measured pesticide exposure compared to those with lower intake.

Detoxification Support

While the concept of “detoxification” has been commercialized with many unproven approaches, evidence-based strategies include:

Ensuring Proper Hydration:

Adequate water intake supports natural elimination processes
Filtered water reduces ongoing exposure

Supporting Liver Function:

Foods rich in sulfur compounds like garlic and onions
Adequate protein for detoxification processes
Cruciferous vegetables containing glucosinolates

Promoting Healthy Elimination:

Fiber-rich foods to bind toxins in the digestive tract
Regular physical activity to support circulation and lymphatic flow
Adequate sleep to support the brain’s glymphatic system

A review in Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine found evidence that specific dietary components can upregulate detoxification pathways and potentially reduce body burden of certain environmental toxins.

Cognitive Support Strategies

When toxin exposure may have affected cognitive function, targeted support can help:

Executive Function Training:

Structured activities to build working memory capacity
Metacognitive strategy instruction
Environmental scaffolding to support executive function challenges

Attention Support:

Movement breaks and physical activity
Mindfulness and focused attention practices
Environmental modifications to reduce distractions

Processing Support:

Multisensory learning approaches
Accommodations that provide additional processing time
Technology tools to supplement areas of processing weakness

Research in Developmental Psychology demonstrated that children with known toxin exposure who received targeted cognitive interventions showed significant improvements in affected domains, suggesting neural plasticity can be leveraged to promote recovery.

Case Studies: Environmental Factors in Learning Challenges

Case 1: The Mystery of Fluctuating Attention

Eight-year-old Miguel struggled with inconsistent attention that puzzled his parents and teachers. Some days he could focus well, while others he seemed completely unable to concentrate despite medication for ADHD. Through careful investigation, his parents discovered elevated levels of pesticides were being used in their apartment complex on a monthly schedule—correlating perfectly with Miguel’s worst attention days.

After advocating for less toxic pest management and implementing a more intensive cleaning routine after applications, Miguel’s attention became significantly more consistent. His neuropsychologist noted: “This was a classic case of how environmental exposures can mimic or exacerbate attention disorders. Once the exposure was reduced, we saw his true baseline and could provide more effective support.”

Case 2: The School Environment Connection

Twelve-year-old Sophia had always been an excellent student until her family moved and she started at a new school. Within months, she developed headaches, fatigue, and significant drops in academic performance, particularly in working memory and processing speed. Medical evaluations found no obvious cause.

A careful environmental assessment revealed her new classroom was in an older school building with poor ventilation, recent renovations using high-VOC materials, and visible water damage suggesting possible mold. After temporarily relocating to a different classroom while advocating for remediation, Sophia’s symptoms improved dramatically within weeks, and her cognitive function returned to previous levels.

Case 3: Cumulative Toxic Load and Complex Learning Profile

Ten-year-old Jackson presented with an unusual learning profile including specific deficits in visual-spatial processing, working memory, and auditory processing that didn’t fit typical patterns of learning disabilities. Comprehensive testing revealed elevated levels of several toxins, including lead (from an old home renovation) and phthalates (from extensive plastic use in the home).

A multifaceted approach was implemented, including environmental changes, targeted nutritional support, and specific cognitive interventions. After six months, Jackson showed significant improvements in both working memory and processing speed, though some challenges remained. His neuropsychologist commented: “We often see these atypical learning profiles in children with multiple toxin exposures. The good news is that with appropriate support, the brain’s plasticity can allow for significant recovery.”

Moving Forward: Advocating for Healthier Environments

Beyond individual actions, broader changes are needed to protect children’s neurological health:

Policy-Level Changes Needed

Chemical Safety Reform:

Requiring pre-market safety testing of chemicals
Taking a precautionary approach to neurological effects
Considering cumulative exposures and vulnerable populations
Implementing stronger regulations on known neurotoxins

Environmental Justice:

Addressing disproportionate toxic exposures in low-income communities
Ensuring equal protection from environmental hazards
Supporting communities facing environmental health challenges
Prioritizing clean-up of toxic sites near schools and residential areas

School Environmental Health:

Implementing comprehensive environmental health standards for schools
Regular testing and transparency about results
Non-toxic pest management requirements
Green cleaning product policies

How Parents Can Create Change

Individual Advocacy:

Communicate with schools about environmental health concerns
Request information about pest management, cleaning products, and air quality
Share resources with other parents about reducing exposures
Consider environmental factors when evaluating learning or behavioral issues

Collective Action:

Join or form parent groups focused on healthy school environments
Support organizations working on children’s environmental health
Engage with local officials on environmental health policies
Share knowledge about the connections between environment and learning

Professional Collaboration:

Work with healthcare providers to consider environmental factors
Connect environmental health experts with educational professionals
Build awareness among learning specialists about environmental influences
Support research on environmental impacts on learning and development

Conclusion: A New Dimension in Understanding Learning

Environmental toxins represent a critical yet often overlooked dimension in the complex puzzle of children’s learning and developmental challenges. While genes and educational approaches certainly play important roles, the growing science of environmental impacts on brain development offers new insights—and new opportunities for supporting children’s optimal development.

For parents navigating learning disabilities or developmental concerns, considering the potential role of environmental factors opens additional avenues for understanding and intervention. This doesn’t mean environmental toxins are behind every learning challenge, but rather that they represent one important factor in the complex interplay of influences on brain development.

Dr. Bruce Lanphear summarizes the paradigm shift: “We’ve traditionally viewed learning and developmental problems as primarily genetic or as failures of educational approaches. The emerging understanding of environmental influences challenges us to think more broadly—about how the environments we create for our children affect their ability to learn and thrive.”

By understanding these influences and taking practical steps to create healthier environments, we can support not just individual children but entire communities of developing minds. The science is clear: protecting children’s environments means protecting their potential to learn, grow, and flourish.

References

Bellinger, D. C. (2013). Prenatal exposures to environmental chemicals and children’s neurodevelopment: An update. Safety and Health at Work, 4(1), 1-11.
Bennett, D., Bellinger, D. C., Birnbaum, L. S., Bradman, A., Chen, A., Cory-Slechta, D. A., … & Lanphear, B. P. (2016). Project TENDR: Targeting environmental neuro-developmental risks. The TENDR consensus statement. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(7), A118-A122.
Bouchard, M. F., Chevrier, J., Harley, K. G., Kogut, K., Vedar, M., Calderon, N., … & Eskenazi, B. (2011). Prenatal exposure to organophosphate pesticides and IQ in 7-year-old children. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(8), 1189-1195.
Costa, L. G., Cole, T. B., Coburn, J., Chang, Y. C., Dao, K., & Roqué, P. J. (2017). Neurotoxicity of traffic-related air pollution. Neurotoxicology, 59, 133-139.
Grandjean, P., & Landrigan, P. J. (2014). Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. The Lancet Neurology, 13(3), 330-338.
Guxens, M., Lubczyńska, M. J., Muetzel, R. L., Dalmau-Bueno, A., Jaddoe, V. W., Hoek, G., … & El Marroun, H. (2018). Air pollution exposure during fetal life, brain morphology, and cognitive function in school-age children. Biological Psychiatry, 84(4), 295-303.
Herbstman, J. B., Sjödin, A., Kurzon, M., Lederman, S. A., Jones, R. S., Rauh, V., … & Perera, F. (2010). Prenatal exposure to PBDEs and neurodevelopment. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(5), 712-719.
Lanphear, B. P., Hornung, R., Khoury, J., Yolton, K., Baghurst, P., Bellinger, D. C., … & Roberts, R. (2005). Low-level environmental lead exposure and children’s intellectual function: an international pooled analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(7), 894-899.
Margolis, A. E., Herbstman, J. B., Davis, K. S., Thomas, V. K., Tang, D., Wang, Y., … & Rauh, V. A. (2016). Longitudinal effects of prenatal exposure to air pollutants on self-regulatory capacities and social competence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(7), 851-860.
Perera, F. P., Li, Z., Whyatt, R., Hoepner, L., Wang, S., Camann, D., & Rauh, V. (2009). Prenatal airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and child IQ at age 5 years. Pediatrics, 124(2), e195-e202.
Rauh, V. A., Garfinkel, R., Perera, F. P., Andrews, H. F., Hoepner, L., Barr, D. B., … & Whyatt, R. W. (2006). Impact of prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure on neurodevelopment in the first 3 years of life among inner-city children. Pediatrics, 118(6), e1845-e1859.
Sagiv, S. K., Thurston, S. W., Bellinger, D. C., Altshul, L. M., & Korrick, S. A. (2012). Neuropsychological measures of attention and impulse control among 8-year-old children exposed prenatally to organochlorines. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(6), 904-909.
Suades-González, E., Gascon, M., Guxens, M., & Sunyer, J. (2015). Air pollution and neuropsychological development: a review of the latest evidence. Endocrinology, 156(10), 3473-3482.
Trasande, L., Zoeller, R. T., Hass, U., Kortenkamp, A., Grandjean, P., Myers, J. P., … & Heindel, J. J. (2015). Estimating burden and disease costs of exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the European Union. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 100(4), 1245-1255.
Zota, A. R., Adamkiewicz, G., & Morello-Frosch, R. A. (2010). Are PBDEs an environmental equity concern? Exposure disparities by socioeconomic status. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(15), 5691-5692.

Note: This blog post is intended for educational purposes only. While the information presented is based on scientific research, individual situations vary. Always consult with qualified healthcare professionals regarding concerns about environmental exposures and your child’s development.

The Hidden Impact of Environmental Toxins on Children’s Brain Development and Learning